Lua Bindings for RADOS Object Class Handlers
TweetThe Ceph distributed file system is built on top of a scalable object store called RADOS, which is also used as a basis for several products including RADOS Gateway and RBD. One feature of RADOS is the Object Class system, providing the ability to allow developers to define new object behavior by writing C++ plugins that execute within the context of the storage system nodes, and operate on object using arbitrary functions.
One downside to using object classes is the injection of new functionality into the system. A compiled C++ plugin must be delivered and dynamically loaded into each OSD process. This becomes more complicated if a cluster is composed of multiple architecture targets, and makes it difficult to update functionality on the fly.
One approach to addressing these problems is to embed a language run-time within the OSD, and use an interpreted language to write handlers. In this way new functionality can be easily injected into the system. The Lua language and its runtime (either LuaVM and LuaJIT) is considered to be among the fastest, most light-weight extension language available. In the remainder of this post we show the design of Lua Object Class Handlers.
Default Error Handling
When performing an I/O operation (e.g. reading an extent from an object) it is
common to simply return the error because there is little that can be done to
recover from most errors. In the following object class handler code snippet
the goal is to create the object being referenced by the operation, and throw
an error if it already exists (i.e. exclusive creation). Note that the true
parameter to cls_cxx_create
indicates exclusive creation semantics.
A common pattern. When a negative value is returned from an object class
handler the current transaction will be aborted, and the return value is
passed back to the client. When the handler has completed successfully a
return value of zero will commit the transaction. In Lua this common pattern
for handling errors is fully managed. In the previous example, if the object
already exists, then the handler aborts and -EEXIST
is returned
automagically. The following handler named handle
shows an example of this
pattern in Lua. Note that the return
statement won't be reached if an
exception is thrown in cls.create
.
Explicitly returning zero is optional. A handler that returns without providing an explicit return value will default to the same behavior as if zero had been returned explicitly. The two handlers shown above have identical semantics.
Explicit Error Handling
Some operations return error codes that we may want to handle directly. For
example, when retrieving a value from the object map, ENOENT
is used to
indicate that the given key was not found. If the handler code can deal with
this case (e.g. creating and initializing a new key), then it is simple enough
to just return all other error codes.
In order to capture the return value in Lua, we have to call the RADOS
interface in protected mode (similar to catching an exception). This is done
using the standard pcall
interface provided in Lua.
These two error handling patterns cover many cases, but there are still ways
to improve the interface. Currently an error is logged in the OSD using a
generic message from strerror
. It would be useful to allow the handler to
define context dependent error messages that provide more information.